Which makes me wonder: where did professional ethics go?

[rochon.a1.119]

Taking over your customers' networks
You'd assume that this kind of thing doesn't happen in real life, that you only see it in low-budget movies where they don't have much to invest in a more diverse plot.

However, in the agency where I work, it is common to hear: “the agency we worked with does not want to give us access”, “they tell us that they created it and that is why it belongs to them” and a few other arbitrary things.



At what point did pseudo-agencies or pseudo-community managers begin to think that the fact that they create a network makes them owners of it?

Perhaps intellectual property rules on social media are not well defined?

Won't they realize the simple rule that everything created and produced through a paid service belongs to whoever pays for it?

I think my questions alone answer my perspective on this topic.

Do not deliver access and developed content
In continuation with the previous point, it is also common cyprus phone number list that they not only keep the social networks created but also the editable versions of the developed content.

Which brings me to the same point: the content created always belongs to whoever pays for it.

What is the strange reason why some pseudo-agencies consider it should be different?

Companies should always have full access to everything produced for them.

Offering unattainable things
Many times companies come with unrealistic objectives, the job of a professional social media agency is to guide the company to discover with numbers why they are not realistic and which ones are.