The first thing we must understand is that by defending the copyright of others, we build our work as content producers .
Plagiarism is a violation of copyright in which the offender copies, in whole or in part, another person's work and presents it as his own, without citing the true copyright holder, deceiving the public and the consumer.
Basically, in plagiarism, the offender misappropriates something that was not created by him and hides the true origin of that production, not mentioning the true author or original author of that content.
Ideas, by themselves, are not protected by copyright.
According to article 8 of the Copyright Law (Law 9.610/98), ideas are not subject to copyright protection.
This is for legal security reasons. Therefore, if you told someone that you have the idea of writing about a certain topic on your social network or in your final paper and that person writes about it, there is no plagiarism.
For your video, post, e-book, course, or academic egypt whatsapp data work to receive copyright protection, it must be externalized, that is, published, it must be part of the world.
Content that is still in the world of ideas is not protected by copyright and therefore cannot be plagiarized.
It is important to understand that plagiarism is a crime provided for in Article 184 of the Brazilian Penal Code, and anyone who violates an author's rights is subject to a prison sentence of 3 (three) months to 1 (one) year, or a fine.
Brazilian laws also apply to the digital environment, meaning that every action taken on the internet and social media must comply with our legislation.
Therefore, the concept of plagiarism applicable to academic work (TCC, Master's Dissertations and Doctoral Theses, for example) is also inserted within a digital context.
Therefore, the text, image or video published on any digital platform must be original, and if there is any element that is authored by another person, the author must cite it, under penalty of committing an illegal practice.
In other words, all content published on social media pages, in texts, images and videos, also receives immediate copyright protection.
Plagiarism, imitation or inspiration?
Plagiarism on social media is the reproduction in whole or in part of an intellectual product authored by third parties, leading the audience to believe that it is one's own production.
In other words, it is a misleading and fraudulent conduct practiced with the intention of leading someone to believe that the plagiarist is the true creator of that content.
We cannot confuse plagiarism with imitation. Talking about the same subject as someone else does not necessarily constitute plagiarism.
However, a person who imitates tends to be rejected by the market in which he operates.
So it is smarter to develop content based on your own professional and personal experiences than to imitate or copy other content producers.
Inspiration usually comes with the source of that inspiration.
Those who allow themselves to be inspired are also inspiring and therefore pay homage to their sources, which represents sophistication and wisdom.
Citing the sources and references of our work is a way of building and ennobling the production of content.
Inspiration is about stimulating creativity, it is a way of instilling ideas. Inspiration does not leave room for copying.
The difference between plagiarism and inspiration is precisely this creative process, and paying homage to the sources used is one of the main ways to illustrate it.
What is considered plagiarism on social media?
Copying texts without citing the author;
Copy texts and images without citing the author;
Copying a concept created by someone without citing the author;
Even in such situations, it is important to note that in any scenario where there is a suspicion of plagiarism, the entire content and scenario must be analyzed on a case-by-case basis. It is not enough to analyze just the image. A detailed reading and comparison between the original material and the plagiarism is necessary.
Is REPOST or SHARING also considered plagiarism?
NO, from the moment the author's reference is included, as in the case of a repost, giving due credit to the content creator, it is not plagiarism, but rather content mediation.