Page 1 of 1

Theoretically, this could affect the

Posted: Tue Jan 21, 2025 10:34 am
by sumaiyakhatun29
The search engine more actively indexes text posts and posts with links: After six months, the share of indexed posts decreases An analysis of 813 posts published more than six months ago shows a decline in the share of posts in the index: The trend of decreasing share of indexed notes continues across content types: Google is good at forgetting: Only half of posts older than a year are in the index An analysis of 820 notes published more than a year ago confirms Google's ability to forget: The picture in terms of content types looks like this: Google remembers texts and posts with links well.

Xwith videos in the index The index contains just over half of all notes. The saudi arabia email list aggregated data from the analysis of 3,246 Facebook posts shows this picture: In terms of content types, the data looks like this: Facebook likes and shares are useless in terms of influencing the resource's position in Google SERP Marketers who cheat don’t have to spend money on Facebook social signal boosting.


First, Google doesn’t take into account “likes” when ranking a page. The search engine only has access to the total number of “likes” for each page, but this information is useless. Secondly, reposts do not affect the indexing of pages by search robots. If links from Facebook do not make pages more visible to search engines, then they cannot positively affect positions in search results.