How detailed should the CIM be?
Posted: Sun Dec 22, 2024 8:54 am
A mature customer can usually easily justify the need for a 3D model. For example, developers who have robotic equipment for the production of reinforced concrete structures at their facilities often require them to optimize the production process. In such cases, the CIM really becomes a tool for saving time and resources. In other words, it is important for the customer to invest in internal development and training of specialists. Without this, even the most advanced models will remain useless.
Ivan Truskov also added that it will not be possible to stay in 2D design for very long. Design germany phone number list organizations will have to move to 3D modeling and begin to master the corresponding software.
In the second topic of discussion, experts touched upon the issue of developing three-dimensional models and the documentation produced from them.
Sergey Dragomirov noted that today in Russia there are no mandatory requirements for the presentation of 3D models in state regulatory acts. Even PP No. 614 ("On approval of the Rules for the formation and maintenance of an information model of a capital construction project, the composition of information, documents and materials included in the information model of a capital construction project and presented in the form of electronic documents, and requirements for the formats of said electronic documents"), which concerns the PD stage, only obliges the use of a 3D model as a supplement to the graphic part, but does not introduce an obligation to present it in full.
If the design assignment includes an obligation to create a 3D model, it becomes the subject of an expert assessment, whose specialist is obliged to check the project's compliance with the assignment, regardless of his qualifications or tools. If discrepancies are discovered during the inspection, the expert may be held liable for issuing a false opinion under Article 307 of the Criminal Code. Therefore, any new elements in the project must be checked for compliance with the requirements established in the technical assignment or legislative acts. But so far, there are no such documents.
Therefore, it is important to understand that if you want to minimize possible comments, it is better to limit yourself to the minimum information in the technical task. If there are many details, then the implementation of some of them can be skipped due to the human factor. And since the expert will definitely check each point, then you risk incurring additional problems. In practice, there are real cases when the lack of attribute information in a three-dimensional model became the cause of litigation and led to significant financial losses for the design organization.
Thus, it is not always advantageous to include additional requirements in the technical specification. If the customer is competent, he will most likely use all his specialists to check the documentation. In this case, the designer must be ready to conduct a thorough examination, which will affect the timing of signing the acts of work performed and other documents.
Ivan Truskov also added that it will not be possible to stay in 2D design for very long. Design germany phone number list organizations will have to move to 3D modeling and begin to master the corresponding software.
In the second topic of discussion, experts touched upon the issue of developing three-dimensional models and the documentation produced from them.
Sergey Dragomirov noted that today in Russia there are no mandatory requirements for the presentation of 3D models in state regulatory acts. Even PP No. 614 ("On approval of the Rules for the formation and maintenance of an information model of a capital construction project, the composition of information, documents and materials included in the information model of a capital construction project and presented in the form of electronic documents, and requirements for the formats of said electronic documents"), which concerns the PD stage, only obliges the use of a 3D model as a supplement to the graphic part, but does not introduce an obligation to present it in full.
If the design assignment includes an obligation to create a 3D model, it becomes the subject of an expert assessment, whose specialist is obliged to check the project's compliance with the assignment, regardless of his qualifications or tools. If discrepancies are discovered during the inspection, the expert may be held liable for issuing a false opinion under Article 307 of the Criminal Code. Therefore, any new elements in the project must be checked for compliance with the requirements established in the technical assignment or legislative acts. But so far, there are no such documents.
Therefore, it is important to understand that if you want to minimize possible comments, it is better to limit yourself to the minimum information in the technical task. If there are many details, then the implementation of some of them can be skipped due to the human factor. And since the expert will definitely check each point, then you risk incurring additional problems. In practice, there are real cases when the lack of attribute information in a three-dimensional model became the cause of litigation and led to significant financial losses for the design organization.
Thus, it is not always advantageous to include additional requirements in the technical specification. If the customer is competent, he will most likely use all his specialists to check the documentation. In this case, the designer must be ready to conduct a thorough examination, which will affect the timing of signing the acts of work performed and other documents.