It is a known fact that content developed e
Posted: Mon Dec 23, 2024 5:45 am
Working with AI
When it comes to mass content production, humans cannot compete with the productivity and efficiency that AI offers. This makes it inevitable that anyone looking for content will consider AI to quickly provide cost-effective ways to populate even entire websites. However, this reliance can create problems with the long-term viability of this content, thanks to how SEO works.
ntirely by AI does not perform well over time. There are several reasons for this, the first being that the inherently unoriginal nature of AI-created articles will tend to get lost among hundreds or thousands of others. This problem is compounded by the fact that Google’s AI periodically checks for AI-created articles that it deems to be of lower quality than unique human articles. When this happens, AI articles experience a significant drop-off soon after their creation as they lack evergreen appeal. Furthermore, these AI detectors are constantly improving, which lengthens the lifespan of the best AI content .
The second major problem with AI-based content is its lack how many digits in german phone number of fact-checking ability. AI is often trained on outdated information from a wide range of user sources, and it cannot discern facts from reality the way a human can. It can sometimes misinterpret a joke or even imagine an incorrect fact by misreading the context, and this can destroy the resulting content.
The same goes for general articles, which may seem perfectly correct at first glance, but not stand up to any degree of scrutiny. This is something we have experienced, where correcting errors and false claims caused by AI can take longer than it would take to write an entire article from scratch.
Balancing the human component
As for the longevity of handwritten content, human articles, while not as grammatically accurate as AI ones, are not picked up and declassified due to their flawed nature. In fact, the fact that an article is slightly flawed in a human can contribute to its memorability, helping it stay in the public eye. Over months or years, there is a big difference, for both Google and readers, between handwritten articles and those produced by AI, where poor quality inspires little trust.
When it comes to mass content production, humans cannot compete with the productivity and efficiency that AI offers. This makes it inevitable that anyone looking for content will consider AI to quickly provide cost-effective ways to populate even entire websites. However, this reliance can create problems with the long-term viability of this content, thanks to how SEO works.
ntirely by AI does not perform well over time. There are several reasons for this, the first being that the inherently unoriginal nature of AI-created articles will tend to get lost among hundreds or thousands of others. This problem is compounded by the fact that Google’s AI periodically checks for AI-created articles that it deems to be of lower quality than unique human articles. When this happens, AI articles experience a significant drop-off soon after their creation as they lack evergreen appeal. Furthermore, these AI detectors are constantly improving, which lengthens the lifespan of the best AI content .
The second major problem with AI-based content is its lack how many digits in german phone number of fact-checking ability. AI is often trained on outdated information from a wide range of user sources, and it cannot discern facts from reality the way a human can. It can sometimes misinterpret a joke or even imagine an incorrect fact by misreading the context, and this can destroy the resulting content.
The same goes for general articles, which may seem perfectly correct at first glance, but not stand up to any degree of scrutiny. This is something we have experienced, where correcting errors and false claims caused by AI can take longer than it would take to write an entire article from scratch.
Balancing the human component
As for the longevity of handwritten content, human articles, while not as grammatically accurate as AI ones, are not picked up and declassified due to their flawed nature. In fact, the fact that an article is slightly flawed in a human can contribute to its memorability, helping it stay in the public eye. Over months or years, there is a big difference, for both Google and readers, between handwritten articles and those produced by AI, where poor quality inspires little trust.