Page 1 of 1

Fake participation works as communication harakiri.

Posted: Sun Jan 19, 2025 8:30 am
by Bappy32
The sender stabs himself with his own (implicit) message. We still often encounter this in internal communication and communication during change. The closed atmosphere around persuasive models (who change name and direction every six months) and the associated media monopolies from the previous century, feels stale in a dynamic digital environment, in which everyone has a voice. This environment clearly sets different rules for communication than the rules that were drawn up twenty years ago around media and journalism. The concept creators of HOK should have realized this.

HOK is therefore a great case for social initiatives on the work floor honduras mobile phone number list (and beyond). If you let participants say A in the process, don't be surprised if they also want to say B. And C: participation is not a persuasive sauce, but active participation of people, peers, colleagues, customers. It is up to the communication sector and especially the higher professional education in communication to face the new rules and come up with fresh authentic ideas and insights. Instead of repeatedly providing old ideas copied from other disciplines with new labels.

Meanwhile, if you surf to soundcloud.com, you will find a nice collection of 'social' alternatives to HOK. Very nice. Involvement is not the problem.