These are considerations that can be understood as obvious

[mahbubamim077]

A reader wrote to us: I am reading one of your books and I see that you always mention the term “legal technology”; you use it to mean new and/or different paths of legal solutions that lawyers can present to their clients to prevent harm and so on. I also see that you use the term “legal innovation” a lot. I would like to know, if possible, if you use “legal innovation” as a synonym for “legal technology” or if they are distinct terms, but intrinsically linked? Reflecting on your teachings, I have some difficulty in clearly understanding this part.

Let's go there. In the usual sense, technology is something that is measured in the scientific field for problem-solving. Methods, techniques, mechanisms, etc., developed and studied within the scope of what can be called scientific knowledge or theoretical knowledge, used to solve problems. Based on the theory of credit instruments, the exchange bulk sms cyprus technology that will be used by all those who work with instruments is formed. When a lawyer is hired for a corporate incorporation, he will use the respective technology that, by the way, is studied, in its foundations, in law schools: Corporate Law. More than that, there is a vast bibliography that explores the legal issue: deeper theory; more sophisticated technology. In fact, better technology, better manufacturing. Now, this technology involves innovations, which can arise from the law, jurisprudence, academia and even practice. Example? Reverse incorporation.

We have a good start: the theory that we were taught in college and that is taught to us in law books is technology for the rest of society. There is a business technology, a real estate technology, a labor technology, a consumer technology, etc., etc. A technology, in fact, that social actors need. There are even cases in which they are implicated by this technology, without realizing it or without giving it importance. It happens all the time; for example, with the phrase: “just sign here, at the x”; not to mention the checkbox , that is, the dialog box that one clicks without thinking and, by doing so, one agrees to the terms and conditions of something that one has not read or understood. So, when the problem explodes, one sits in front of a lawyer, with the eyes of a young child facing his father, the broken pieces of the vase or pitcher right there. For our part, we will continue our litany: lawyers are useful; lawyers are necessary; lawyers can be an investment, instead of an expense. This needs to be learned.