Perhaps that's why prisons are one of the few

[zakiyatasnim]

She notes that emotion recognition systems are based on the weak and unproven scientific assumption that facial expressions are linked to a person's internal emotional state.

Through constant surveillance, people can begin to monitor themselves to trick the system.

Daniel Leufer, a European policy analyst at the nonprofit Digital civil rights organization Access Now, notes that even if the program could bring results, it grossly violates human rights — the right to privacy, freedom of expression, and freedom of thought.

“The worst part is that violations can happen even though iran number data emotion recognition is scientifically impossible. The very fact that people believe it, and create and deploy systems that claim to do so, has a real impact on people,” says Leifer. “Just don’t use it, don’t develop it, don’t fund it.”

“A society that monitors our emotions is a society that will reward some and punish others. Are certain emotions evidence of crime or low productivity?” asks Rob Reich, a professor of political science at Stanford and co-author of the book on ethics and technology, System Error: Where Silicon Valley Went Wrong and How We Can Reboot.

“Big Brother will be watching… The result will be a systematic invasion of privacy and the degradation of humanity,” claims Rob Reich.

Leifer adds that using artificial intelligence systems to monitor other people's emotions is unethical, especially if the surveillance is conducted by employers, police, and governments—those to whom those being monitored are subordinate.

workplaces that have openly admitted to using the program.

Taigusys CEO previously told The Guardian that his company’s systems are installed in 300 prisons and detention centers across China, connecting to around 60,000 cells in such facilities and helping to make prisoners “more compliant.”