Myth 1. A screen reader will read any website

[subornaakter24]

There is less content than in the full version . Of course, the adaptive version should not be overloaded with unnecessary blocks that distract attention from the site content. However, developers often cut even useful content in half. Do not forget that the main task of an online resource is to be informative. The ideal version of the site for people with impaired vision is simpler not in content, but in form.

Errors in the operation of the screen narrator . Often, when adapting a site for the visually impaired, the built-in screen narrator is simply forgotten or it functions incorrectly: it pronounces with errors, does not read all the information, prevents the selection of elements on the screen during the voiceover. Hence the important recommendation - before launching the site, test the screen narrator function.

Incomplete functionality of the control panel . More and more often, an adaptive version is added to a site solely to avoid violations of the law and fines, and not to help people with impaired graphic design email list vision. Often, the control panel that is installed on the site includes only minimal functionality and does not meet the needs of the visually impaired. For example, if a person suffers from dyslexia, increasing the font and changing the color scheme will not help him - the text will remain fuzzy. In this case, the ability to choose a serif font or a setting that increases the inter-letter spacing can help.

Common Mistakes in Creating a Website Version for the Visually Impaired

9 myths about website adaptation for the visually impaired

Formally, this is true, but without adaptation of the site, it will be completely inconvenient for visually impaired people to use it. Let's assume that the headings on the pages of an online store are simply written in caps lock, but are not marked in the layout. This deprives a blind user of the ability to quickly navigate the headings, which is why he spends more time on your site than on a competitor's. Most likely, in the future, he will not have a desire to return to an inconvenient resource.

Or, let's say you go to a website and see only black text on a white background. How comfortable and enjoyable would it be for you to use such a resource? Would you prefer a competitor's beautiful and convenient website?

Myth 2. Only the main pages need to be adapted

There are no small or unimportant elements on a website that can be left unchanged. One of the most common problems is unsigned links in the footer of websites, where icons are usually placed. The links assigned to them lead to groups on social networks. A screen reader user can easily figure out the purpose of an icon if it is accompanied by a text label. Many developers overlook this point, although it takes very little time.


Myth 3. Any person with impaired vision can help adapt a website

Involve specialists in this field to adapt the site for the visually impaired. Do not count on the fact that you will use the help of a person with poor eyesight and he will tell the developers what exactly needs to be done. A blind employee may be a real professional in his field (for example, writing texts or sales), but at the same time he may not understand adaptive layout at all. Therefore, his advice will most likely not be useful.