It's not a magic technique either. Sometimes we naively think that by listening to content, by following a ready-made technique, well we'll be able to apply it in all situations and we'll always have the same magical result. Unfortunately, that's not how it works. Life is full of compromises, life requires great flexibility, and inevitably, there is no magic technique that will work every time. It can be disappointing for people who are looking for ready-made systems, but on the other hand, that's also why life is so interesting, otherwise it wouldn't be fun.
So, I'm not entirely sure technique. I don't remember if it's a podcast or if it's a book. Maybe the book Verbal Judo , so verbal judo. I don't even have the author's name anymore. But I'm not entirely sure.
In any case, the idea is to tell yourself brazil whatsapp number data that when you don't agree with someone, you can go through two stages. Imagine, there is a disagreement between two people, two people don't agree, well you have to go through or you can go through two stages.
The first step is going to be a step during which we're going to try to defuse the conflict. What does defuse mean? You find the word "weapon". No, there's not the word "weapon" in it. Defuse, there's not the word "weapon" at all. In any case, when we talk about defusing, we're indicating that we're trying to calm a situation, to remove tensions. Defuse, that's more how I'd explain it. So, there's no connection with the word "weapon", again, I'll clarify. But it's when we try to calm a situation. A situation that seems explosive, full of stress, well we make it calmer, more serene, cooler.
This first step is super important. It serves to defuse, make the situation a little cooler, to reassure our interlocutor. We can acknowledge that we do not agree, but we can reassure them by finally saying: "Wait, there is no conflict. We are going to calm down, we are going to discuss all this calmly". We can clearly indicate to our interlocutor that we are here to find a solution and that we are going to work together. There is a great rational and communication aspect in this first step which, once again, is not manipulation at all. It is really: "OK. We do not agree. There is something happening, we have to find a solution and we are together".