From the outset, the influencer highlighted who are the actors authorized to initiate the legislative process: deputies and senators; Committees of the Chamber, Senate or National Congress; President of the Republic; Supreme Federal Court (STF); Superior Courts, Attorney General's Office (PGR) and citizens through popular initiative - such as the case of Gloria Perez, where the artist mobilized thousands of people across the country and gained support to indicate the expansion of the Heinous Crimes Law.
After the agenda is presented, all matters begin to be processed by the Chamber of Deputies, except for bills from Committees or the Senate, and from then on the order of dispatch is given by the General Secretariat of the Board of Directors, which will determine the path that the proposal will follow and which Committees will be responsible for evaluating the matter. This determination may follow two main criteria: affinity of the agendas with the Thematic Committees and the political dynamics that are established between the legislative houses – remembering that Provisional Measures (MPVs) and Proposed Amendments to the Constitution (PECs) do not receive dispatch, as they have a fixed processing schedule, already defined by the Constitution.
Once the matter has been forwarded to the Committees, rapporteurs hong kong mobile database are appointed, i.e., the parliamentarians who are responsible for analyzing the proposal with the aim of offering a favorable or unfavorable opinion on the initial matter. Rapporteurs also have the power to alter the text of the proposal, indicating few or many changes, and may even modify the initial idea of the project presented. Both Barreto and Beatriz emphasize that, for the work of the lobbyist, at this stage of the process it is more interesting for the professional to act in influencing the presidents and members of the Committees and the rapporteur of the matter, rather than the original author.
After being analyzed by the Committees of Merit, the admissibility of the matters will be analyzed, which are adequate by the financial and budgetary order and technical and legislative constitutionality, work assigned to the Finance and Taxation Committee (CFT) and the Constitution, Justice and Citizenship Committee (CCJC). Projects that do not indicate budgetary compensation or demonstrate a defect in the initiative will hardly go beyond this point because they do not comply with the Committees' requirements.
And what projects are going to the Plenary?
Until the last legislature, 80% of the bills that became laws originating from the Chamber were analyzed only by the Committees, which is practically the rule of the legislative process. The political scientist explains that, if approved by the Committees, the matters go to the Senate or directly for sanction, otherwise, they will be analyzed by the Plenary.