Diagnostics of team cohesion using the Seashore method

[Mimaktsa10]

To calculate the team cohesion coefficient, it is necessary to first collect and calculate all the data for the sociometric matrix, after which you can begin to determine the indicators of disunity and cohesion.



However, in addition to lengthy and labor-intensive calculations, there is a simpler method of five questions that allows you to assess the team cohesion index.

The beginning of the 20th century was uae email list marked by the development of various psychological methods for studying the microclimate in a team, identifying hidden conflicts, etc. In particular, groups of factors were discovered that determine the success of the integration of a particular individual into a team:

external factors;

personality traits;

team factors;

factors related to group management.

Seashore's methodology for assessing team cohesion will be useful when studying established work groups that have long experienced problems with interpersonal relationships.

Case: VT-metall
Find out how we reduced the cost of attracting an application by 13 times for a metalworking company in Moscow
Find out how
It helps to identify aliens who have not taken root in the group, increase labor productivity and unite workers, which will positively affect the commercial success of the business.

Each team member is given five standard multiple choice questions. There is no need to give points here - just mark the most appropriate option.

Your role in the work team:

You feel like you are a part of it (5).

Participate in many types of work (4).

Participate only in certain types of work, avoiding other types (3).

You don’t feel like you’re part of a team (2).

You exist on your own, you don’t feel connected to the group (1).

It's difficult to answer, I don't know (1).

Would you change groups, all other things being equal, if you were offered to do so?

Yes, I want to move to another team (1).

I am more inclined to the option of moving to another team (2).

It doesn't matter (3).

Tends to stay in the current group (4).

I stick to my group and will try to stay in it (5).

It's difficult to answer, I don't know (1).

How would you characterize the relationships between your team members?

They are better than many other groups (3).

Ordinary, like in many other groups (2).

Worse than other groups (1).

It's hard to say, I don't know (1).

Describe your relationship with your superiors:

They are better than many other groups (3).

Ordinary, like in many other groups (2).

Worse than other groups (1).

It's hard to say, I don't know (1).

Describe your attitude to the work in your group:

It is better than many other groups (3).

The usual, as in many other groups (2).

Worse than other groups (1).

It's hard to say, I don't know (1).

For further analysis of team cohesion using the Seashore method, the points scored for all questions are added up. If everything is done correctly, the final value fits into the gradation given below.