Questioning the uses and tactics of residents to adapt housing
The observation of uses shows the importance of diversions of existing developments and personal adaptation strategies allowing elderly people to remain in their homes, at a lower cost of transformation. These uses highlight the resources of practical ingenuity and creativity of elderly people who remain, from then on and against certain prejudices, active in relation to their habitat. Each strategy, mobilizing supports, is specific to the person's journey, their sociability and the lived environment. Thus, even if we can say that the large complex participates in the social and spatial inclusion of its elderly residents, the question of uses and personal adaptation strategies remains essential in this inclusion. However, this question remains an unthought of the debate on inclusive housing, opposing universalist vision and technical-administrative vision which are based solely on the spatial morphology of habitats and aim at the transformation of the living conditions of elderly people [8] . These generic modifications are made, a priori , without taking into account the uses, the singular needs and the personal adaptation strategies that could be an interesting source of inspiration. Finally, the first feedbacks on new dedicated housing or overly technical adaptations of housing, encourage us to think of other ways of taking ageing into account .
Figure 4: Inhabited survey of a dwelling showing appropriations over time (in yellow, demolitions; in red, transformations carried out by a resident who has owned his dwelling for more than 50 years)
The expertise of the residents' experience, based among other things on residential seniority and knowledge of the history of the neighborhoods, is part of south korea phone number list a long time frame that goes beyond the performance and normative injunctions addressed to landlords and managers. The recognition of this long time frame allows us to understand that the neighborly, friendly, and family relationships of the elderly are organized around a relationship of reciprocity and not of subordination or even dependence [9] . However, this relationship is intrinsically linked to the residential seniority of the people on the site, to the networks of inter-acquaintance, friends, and neighbors, and to the feeling of belonging to a residential community. These attachments are difficult to transpose in the case of rehousing or moving. Housing, however suitable it may be, will not be able to replace the weight of the years, habits, and attachments created by the person. This is why the question of the mutation of the elderly should be reconsidered if we want to change the culture of aging. Moving an elderly person who has lived their entire life in a home and in a neighborhood necessarily entails the deprivation of a reciprocity that keeps the person active in the present time, and the subjection to a functional and technical arrangement that reduces them to physical autonomy. This relationship of reciprocity is crucial if we wish to change perspective and consider that in the long term of our existences, we are all vulnerable [10] .